| 000 | 01682cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50820 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u97523 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTrafalgar House Construction (Regions) Limited v General Surety and Guarantee Co Limited | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1994 CILL 912-915(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 22 February 1994. T were the main contractors for the construction of a leisure complex. They engaged K as the sub-contractor for groundworks. K procured a bond from G for 10% of the sub-contract sum. During the course of the work K went into receivership and T took over completion of the work and made a claim under the bond. The ORC found that the amount of damage sustained by T exceeded the amount and gave summary judgement for the full amount of the bond. G appealed. It was held that the bond imposed upon G an independent obligation to pay the damages sustained by T from the failure of the subcontractors to carry out the work. The bond did not create a guarantee in the ordinary sense. G argued that the sum payable should take into account all set-off and cross claims between the parties however CA held that G should pay the amount of the damages which T asserts is correct. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCONDITIONAL BONDS | ||
| 650 | _aMERCERS V NEW HAMPSHIRE | ||
| 650 | _aON DEMAND BONDS | ||
| 650 | _aPERFORMANCE BONDS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aSURETIES | ||
| 650 | _aSURETY BONDS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c59630 _d59630 |
||