| 000 | 00889cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X84628 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u98514 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aCarter, H. | ||
| 245 | _aShimizu | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vJune 1997, 503-510; July 1997, 603-610(16) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the implications for listed building consent of the judgment in "Shimizu (UK) Ltd v Westminster CC". It determined that removal of part of listed building is alteration and not demolition. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aDEMOLITION | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS ACT 1990 | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aSHIMIZU V WESTMINSTER CC | ||
| 690 | _aCONSERVATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 700 | _aBrainsby, M. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c18/06/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c59896 _d59896 |
||