000			01088cab a2200205 4500
001			X90723
008			090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u99316
041			_aeng
245			_aKhazanchi v Faircharm Investments Ltd; McLeod v Butterwick
260			_c1998
350			_a0
490			_aNew Property Cases _v1998 NPC 47
520			_aCA 17 March 1998. The court cosniders whether a bailiff distraining for rent or a sheriff executing a writ of fiere facial in a dwelling house may forcibly re-enter premises in which goods are kept for the purpose of removing them for sale. Unldess they had been deliverately excluded the mere fact that they found the premises locked did not give them the right of forcible re-entry. A tenant of commercial premises fails however to prove special damage against the bailiff and was thus barred by statute. The householder establishes a cause of action.
650			_aFIERI FACIAS
650			_aSEIZURE OF GOODS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c25/03/1998
999			_c59921 _d59921