| 000 | 00930cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3539-24 | ||
| 008 | 000000n1999 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u100268 | ||
| 245 | _aInformal enforcement | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9939) 2 October 1999, 148(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe case of "Yaxley v Gotts" upholds that the doctrine of estoppel will not be used to validate an oral agreement over land that statute requires to be in writing. However, whilst the CA was unanimous in its acceptance of this principle, it was also prepared to use proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts to give effect to informal agreements. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aYAXLEY V GOTTS | ||
| 650 | _aESTOPPEL | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC POLICY | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 S2 | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c60045 _d60045 |
||