| 000 | 01026cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS61402 | ||
| 008 | 000000n1999 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u100548 | ||
| 100 | _aBickford-Smith, S. | ||
| 245 | _aMore thoughts on experts | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 490 |
_aRent Review & Lease Renewal _v(3) September 1999, 153-157(3) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the court's jurisdiction to decide questions of construction where a rent review is to be decided by an expert. It examines the CA decision in "National Grid Co plc v M25 Group Ltd" The conclusion drawn is that the court seems more willing to consider questions of construction even though the review is to be determined by an expert. (from article abstract). | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEW CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT DETERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aNATIONAL GRID CO PLC V M25 GROUP LTD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 700 | _aMale, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c60147 _d60147 |
||