| 000 | 01003cam a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60828 | ||
| 008 | 000000n1999 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u101329 | ||
| 100 | _aHall, B. | ||
| 245 | _aClear intentions for winning applications. | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v64(21) 28 May, 16(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses a recent Court of Appeal decision in the case "Tesco Stores Ltd v North Norfolk District Council" which related to the development of a new supermarket. The case hinged on a drainage condition attached to the permission, with the Court of Appeal upholding the decision of the High Court that it was possible for a letter or plan to cover two purposes, for example a drainage condition and reserved matters, however the applicant must make this clear when the application is put to the Council. | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aRESERVED MATTERS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c60477 _d60477 |
||