| 000 | 01125cam a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS60846 | ||
| 008 | 000000n1999 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u101356 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G. | ||
| 245 | _aWho is an architect? | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v399(6230) 16 June 1999, 29(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case "Munkenbeck and Marshall v Kensington Hotel" which centred around the use of the term 'architect'. Following the dismissal of Munkenbeck and Marshall from a conversion project, Kensington had refused to pay outstanding fees because Munkenbeck had been in breach of an agreement to use only registered architects on the project. The judge determined that Munkenbeck had properly described its staff as qualified personnel and were entitled to fees, however professional firms do need to be careful to accurately represent qualifications or experience so as not to give clients a pretext to withhold or reduce fee payments. | ||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTS | ||
| 650 | _aPROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c60501 _d60501 |
||