000			01717cam a2200193 4500
001			ABS61170
008			000000n1999 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u101759
245			_aOutwing Construction Ltd v H Randell and Son Ltd.
260			_c1999
490			_aConstruction Law Journal _v[1999] 15 CLJ 308-313(3)
520			_aQBD 15 March 1999. A dispute over payment in a construction contract was referred to adjudication. The adjudicator instructed R to pay O. O invoiced R requiring payment by 2 March. R disputed the decision, referred it to arbitration, and also maintained that the decision was in respect of final payment which was not due till 29 March. O issued a writ, and a summons to abridge time. On the morning of the hearing R paid the amounts claimed, but refused to pay the costs of the application to enforce the decision. R argued that the payment in full of the sums claimed in the writ stayed the proceedings, that the summons to abridge time was not justified, that R were entitled to their costs because they had paid in time for the application to be abandoned. Held, the court has jurisdiction to decide cost applications issued before the automatic stay. That the summons to abridge time was justified. That O were entitled to their costs of issuing the summons and pursuing it.
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
650			_aOUTWING CONSTRUCTION LTD V H RANDELL AND SONS LTD
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c60875 _d60875