| 000 | 00826cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54305 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u9695 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCasey v Canterbury CC | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v1995 RVR 228-229(2) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 17 November 1995. Claim for compensation in respect of tree preservation orders. LT ruled it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant`s claim for damages as there was no statutory right to be compensated for the making of a tree preservation order. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aTREE PRESERVATION ORDERS (TPOs) | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6088 _d6088 |
||