000			01133cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS61175
008			000000n1999 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u101765
100			_aMinogue, A.
245			_aClash points.
260			_c1999
490			_aBuilding _v264(8105) 24 September 1999, 58(1)
520			_aBriefly reviews three recent cases looking at the impact of the new Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) on subcontract litigation. In Stevens v Gullis and another an expert witness was criticised for being too adversarial; in Burrells Wharf Freeholds Ltd v Galliard Homes Ltd an unwillingness to share information was criticised; and in Mars UK Ltd v Teknowledge Ltd a claim with limited prospects of success substantially reduced the award. Argues that the reforms are enabling the courts to deal with cases justly.
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
650			_aSUBCONTRACTS
650			_aLITIGATION
650			_aSTEVENS V GULLIS AND ANOTHER
650			_aBURRELLS WHARF FREEHOLDS LTD V GALLIARD HOMES LTD
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
700			_aKlein, R.
942			_n0
999			_c60880 _d60880