| 000 | 01032cam a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS61235 | ||
| 008 | 000000n1999 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u101839 | ||
| 245 | _aRe Palmiero: debtor 3666 of 1999 | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1999] 38 EG 195-196(2) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 28 July 1999. The petitioning landlord peaceably re-entered business premises, demised to the debtor, in reliance on a forfeiture clause in the lease. In connection with a bankruptcy petition, the debtor tenant contended that he had a right to remove tenant's fixtures that he claimed had a value of over £19 000. "Held", the tenant had no right to remove tenant's fixtures. The decision in Pugh v Arton (1869, LR 8Eq 626) was binding. Accordingly the tenant had no counterclaim based on the landlord's refusal to allow him to remove the fixtures. | ||
| 650 | _aTENANTS' BANKRUPTCY | ||
| 650 | _aPUGH V ARTON | ||
| 650 | _aRE PALMEIRO | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c60949 _d60949 |
||