000			01091cam a2200205 4500
001			ABS61237
008			000000n1999 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u101843
100			_aHugall, J.
245			_aExpired leases, joint tenants and insolvency.
260			_c1999
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v143(34) 10 September 1999, 836-837(2)
520			_aConsiders De Rothschild v Bell in which aspects of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 part 1 were at issue. It was held that when a contractual tenancy is held by joint tenants, but only one of them is resident when the tenancy expires, that tenant is entitled to protection under the act. However this Part 1 continuation tenancy was described as being hybrid: 'not a new tenancy or a statutory tenancy; it is merely the old contractual tenancy continued indefinitely by the act'.
650			_aDE ROTHSCHILD V BELL
650			_aInsolvency _96247
650			_aJOINT TENANCIES
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
700			_aHighmore, R.
942			_n0
999			_c60951 _d60951