000			01283cam a2200181 4500
001			ABS61238
008			000000n1999 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u101846
245			_aRogers v Islington LBC
260			_c1999
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1999] 37 EG 178-183(6)
520			_aCA 30 July 1999. R was the freehold owner of a building which was let out under individual oral agreements for unspecified periods to up to nine single adults at a time. The council (I) claimed that the property was a house in multiple occupation and served a notice to execute works pursuant to the Housing Act 1985 s352. R appealed against the notice and the recorder upheld this. I appealed and sought clarification of Barnes v Sheffield CC. Held, appeal allowed. The two important factors were: the physical arrangements and the nature of the relationship between the occupiers. In Barnes there were 4 or 5 student occupants who were a preformed group for a predetermined period. Here the occupants came to the property one by one for dissimilar and mostly indefinite periods.
650			_aMULTIPLE OCCUPATION
650			_aBARNES V SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL
650			_aROGERS V ISLINGTON LBC
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c60953 _d60953