| 000 | 01163cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS61259 | ||
| 008 | 000000n 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u101878 | ||
| 100 | _aEvans, D. | ||
| 245 | _aObjectors and the development and planning system in the UK. | ||
| 490 |
_aWastes Management _vSeptember 1999, 48-49(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExplains the ways in which decisions on waste or landfill proposals can be challenged by those who object to them. The two methods are by judicial review, which is discretionary, or by statutory challenge, which is not discretionary. In either case the court can only uphold or quash the decision challenged, and cannot substitute another decision. It will also be possible challenge decisions under the Human Rights Act 1998 when it comes into force, but at present it is necessary to petition the European Court to allege a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aWASTE MANAGEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLANDFILL SITES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c60981 _d60981 |
||