000			01471cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38291
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u9811
041			_aeng
245			_aCapocci v Goble
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v284(6355) 10 October 1987, 230-240(3)
520			_aCA 23 June 1987. Appeal by plaintiff tenant (C) against cc decision in favour of landlord (G) who relied on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(f) in refusing to renew a business tenancy on the ground that she needed possession of the premises for development. At issue was whether G`s intention to carry out the development of 10 residential flats had been established. To substantiate such an intention G had to satisfy the court that she had attended to the following: 1) planning permission , 2) finance, and 3) agreement with either a developer or building contractor. The evidence showed that outline planning permission had been granted for the proposed development subject to two conditions, which were unlikely to create any problems, and that the bank had confirmed its willingness to fund the project. C`s main challenge was that no agreement had been reached between G and a developer or building contractor. A company known as Maylarch Properties Ltd had approached G expressing an
650			_aNEW TENANCY
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6170 _d6170