000			01118cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS61611
008			000000n1999 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u102725
245			_aJones and another v Stones
260			_c1999
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[1999] 1 WLR 1739-1746(8)
520			_aCA 11 May 1999. The plaintiffs (J) and the defendant (S) disputed the ownership of a stone wall dividing their properties. In 1990 S placed flower pots and an oil tank on the wall, which J challenged in 1995, claiming trespass. S claimed the wall was a party wall. Although the judge held that the wall was owned by J, he ruled that their delay in challenging the trespass had meant that they acquiesed in it. J appealed. "Held" appeal allowed. Delay was not sufficient grounds for the defence of acquiescence.
590			_aABS
650			_aACQUIESCENCE
650			_aESTOPPEL
650			_aTRESPASS
650			_aDELAY
650			_aBoundary disputes _96221
650			_aBOUNDARY WALLS
650			_aJONES AND ANOTHER V STONES
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c61711 _d61711