| 000 | 01369cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS61610 | ||
| 008 | 000000n1999 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u102757 | ||
| 245 | _aDelaware Mansions Ltd and another v Westminster CC | ||
| 260 | _c1999 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[1999] 46 EG 194-196(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 21 July 1999. In June 1990 the second appellant company (A) purchased the freehold of a number of blocks of flats. The first defendant (D) acted as a maintenance company for the tenants, who owned the company. Prior to the purchase, D had been advised the property was being damaged by the roots of a tree for which the Council (W) were responsible. W refused to fell the tree, and remedial works were carried out to the property. The court below found that because most or all of the damage had occurred prior to purchase and that A and D therefore had no cause of action in nuisance. A and D appealed. "Held" A's appeal allowed: it was irrelevant that the nuisance had existed before A purchased the properties. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aNUISANCE | ||
| 650 | _aSUBSIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aTREE ROOTS | ||
| 650 | _aREMEDIAL WORKS | ||
| 650 | _aDELAWARE MANSIONS LTD AND ANOTHER V WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL | ||
| 650 | _aUNDERPINNING | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c61738 _d61738 |
||