| 000 | 01515cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38295 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u9838 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGratton-Storey v Lewis and another | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v283(6353) 26 September 1987, 1562-1565(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 24 July 1987. Appeal against County Court decision granting the plaintiff`s (G) application that the appellants (L) were not entitled to acquire an outstanding leasehold interest under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 . The freeholders, the Crown Estate Commissioners had granted a lease to G who had granted an underlease which, with licence, was assigned to L. L acquired the freehold and applied for a valuation of G`s immediate leasehold interest in order that they might acquire the outstanding interest. The County Court decided that L were not entitled to acquire the interest. L appealed. In CA it fell to the judge to determine the meaning of the Leaehold Reform Act. It was not felt that the Act could be construed as intended by L - that the acquiring tenant would already own the fee simple and sought only to acquire an intermediate leasehold; the Act did not give L a separate right to acquire the intermediate interest. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aACQUISITION | ||
| 650 | _aASSIGNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6189 _d6189 |
||