000			01509cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38306
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u9887
041			_aeng
245			_aBristol CC v SoS for the Environment and H M Williamson
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1987) JPL 718-721(4)
520			_aQBD 16 March 1987. Appeal by plaintiff (B) from SoS`s grant of a certificate that the premises in question had an established use as a house in multiple occupation as six households with six occupiers, but refusal of a certificate that the premises had an established use as a house in multiple occupation as seven households with nine occupiers, as described in the application. At issue was whether the SoS, or the planning authority, could grant an established use certificate for a lesser use than that described in B`s application. QBD could see no reason for holding that either a planning authority`s power to grant a certificate under the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s94(4) or the SoS`s power under s95(2) should be governed by or overridden by the provisions of s94(3). S94(3) covered two special cases where more than one use of the land was applied for or where it might be that the existing use did not apply to the whole of the land. Those two cases should not govern the implic
650			_aH M WILLIAMSON
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6218 _d6218