| 000 | 00905cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS61818 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u103906 | ||
| 100 | _aSarker, N | ||
| 245 | _aPaying for work done without a contract | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors' Journal _v144(1) 14 January 2000, 12(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in "Countrywide Communications Ltd v ICL Pathway Ltd" which sets out useful guidance on the law of restitution. In this case, the court adopted a common sense approach and found in favour of the subcontractor because the consortium for which it provided services had dishonoured an assurance to provide a contract. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRESTITUTION | ||
| 650 | _aCOUNTRYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS LTD V ICL PATHWAY LTD AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aQUANTUM MERUIT | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c62369 _d62369 |
||