| 000 | 01075cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3606-19 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u104125 | ||
| 245 | _aFair rent | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2000] EGCS 10 (2) |
||
| 520 | _a"R v SoS Environment, Transport and the Regions and another, ex parte Spath Holme Ltd". CA 20 January 2000. The applicant landlord challenged the validity of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which was made by the first respondent under a 'reserve power' contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s31. The applicant landlord claimed that the respondents had exceeded their power to legislate under the reserve power. "Held" The order was quashed. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT (MAXIMUM FAIR RENT) ORDER 1999 | ||
| 650 | _aFAIR RENTS | ||
| 650 | _aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND ANOTHER EX P SPATH HOLME LTD | ||
| 650 | _aREGULATED TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S31 | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c62500 _d62500 |
||