000			01418cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS61971
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u104336
245			_aRosen v The Trustees of the Campden Charities
260			_c2000
490			_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v (2000) P&CR 33-45(7)
520			_aLT 14 May 1999. The appellant was entitled to purchase the freehold of 25 Kensington Gate but it had to be determined whether there had been improvements to the property which, by virtue of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9 fell to be disregarded in the determination of the price. By a license of 1937 certain works were permitted but it was unclear when the works were carried out. Although there was evidence that the respondent (G) had been in occupation prior to the grant of the 1937 lease and the judge found that it was more likely than not that the works were begun and completed before the grant of the 1937 lease. The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal had not taken into account any improvements in determining the price of the house. Appeal allowed.
590			_aABS
650			_aROSEN V TRUSTEES OF THE CAMDEN CHARITIES
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967
650			_aIMPROVEMENTS
650			_aLEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
650			_aDETERMINATION OF PRICE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASEHOLD REFORM-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c62596 _d62596