000			01525cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS61859
008			000000n1999 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u104412
245			_aDaniells v Mendonca and another
260			_c1999
490			_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[1999] 78(5) 401-409(5)
520			_aCA 15 April 1999. The parties lived in adjoining terraced properties. While the plaintiff (D) was on holiday the defendents (M) added a bathroom extension to their house. A wall belonging to D (and built entirely on her land) was used to support the extension. D applied for a mandatory injunction requiring the removal of that part of the extension which encroached on her land and the reinstatement of the roof-felt on her roof. She also claimed an order restraining the defendents from carrying out any further building works other than in accordance with the London Building (Amendment) Act 1939. She further claimed damages and exemplary damages. M admitted the trespass, leaving the question of remedies. The mandatory injunction, the injunction that the work be done in accordance with the 1939 Act and damages were awarded but exemplary damages were refused. Appeal allowed.
590			_aABS
650			_aDANIELLS V MENDONCA AND ANOTHER
650			_aBoundary disputes _96221
650			_aINJUNCTION
650			_aEXTENSION
650			_aTRESPASS
650			_aLONDON BUILDING ACT (AMENDMENT) ACT 1939
690			_aBoundary disputes _96221
942			_n0
999			_c62640 _d62640