000			01704cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS54371
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u10009
041			_aeng
245			_aJ W Childers Trustees v Anker
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1996 01 EG 102-108(7)
520			_aCA 29 June 1995. Appellant tenant (A) rented two parcels of land from respondent landlord (C) on an annual tenancy agreement. At the 1982 and 1985 rent reviews, A agreed to pay a single aggregate rent for both pieces of land. The landlord`s record was amended to show one parcel of land without informing the tenant. In 1989, the tenant entered into a management agreement with the Nature Conservancy Council following the land`s designation as a Site of Special Scientific Interest. At CC proceedings to determine the statement of case by appointed arbitrator in connection with the 1990 rent review, it was stated that the rent was to be fixed on the basis of one holding and that the marriage value of the holding with the other land was a relevant consideration. On appeal, the 1982 and 1985 rental agreements were deemed not to be surrenders of previous tenancies with original agreements remaining in force. Marriage value is considered as a relevant factor under Agricultural Holdings Act 19
650			_aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650			_aAGRICULTURAL RENTS
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aMANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS
650			_aMARRIAGE VALUE
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6292 _d6292