| 000 | 01221cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3612-23 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u104974 | ||
| 245 | _aNegligent valuation | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2000] EGCS 36 (1) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 7 March 2000. "Ball v Banner and others; Neill Clerk (a firm) v Healey & Baker (a firm)". NC sponsored an investment scheme. The investors brought a negligence claim against NC alleging some misrepresentations in the prospectus. The claimant firm NC, sought Part 20 contributions from the defendant valuer HB on the basis that statements attributable to HB in the prospectus were misleading to investors. The main issues were whether HB owed a duty of care to investors, and whether it was in breach of duty. Held, HB was liable for 25% of the damages. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aMEASURE OF DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aVALUERS | ||
| 650 | _aBALL V BANNER AND OTHERS; NEILL CLERK (A FIRM) V HEALEY AND BAKER (A FIRM) | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIL LIABILITY (CONTRIBUTION) ACT 1978 S1 | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF CARE | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c62966 _d62966 |
||