000			01251cam a2200205 4500
001			WB3613-25
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u105061
245			_aEnvironmental impact assessment
260			_c2000
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2000] EGCS 39 (25/03/2000)
520			_a"R v Durham CC and others, ex parte Huddlestone", CA 8 March 2000. Respondent attempted to register a dormant planning permission to extract minerals on a large site. Council informed respondent that an environmental impact assessment (EIA) would be required as part of the process. The EIA was not submitted and planning permission was granted. Applicant who lived near the site challenged determination claiming it should be quashed as it was not accompanied by the EIA. "Held" appeal allowed - the application succeeded to the extent that the council and the respondent were to treat the statutory deeming provision as ineffective.
590			_aWB
650			_aR V DURHAM CC AND OTHERS EX P HUDDLESTONE
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
650			_aPLANNING AND COMPENSATION ACT 1991
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c63008 _d63008