000			01336cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS62187
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u105721
100			_aTugwell, A.
245			_aBeing seen to be done
260			_c2000
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0015) 15 April 2000, 150-151(2)
520			_aConsiders the duty of disclosure for an arbitrator. The CA decision in "Lockerbail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd" (2000) 1 AllER 65 established criteria to identify potential conflicts of interest. The recent High Court decision "Save & Prosper Pensions Ltd v Homebase Ltd" unreported March 2000 ordered the removal of a rent review arbitrator because his firm was acting for a company connected with one of the parties. The court clarified the circumstances in which such a conflict of interest could arise; confirming the scope of any necessary checks and the need for arbitrators to take steps to ensure full and appropriate disclosure. Reviews RICS guidance on the point.
590			_aABS
650			_aCONFLICTS OF INTEREST
650			_aLOCKERBAIL (UK) V BAYFIELD PROPERTIES
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aDUTY OF DISCLOSURE
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c63312 _d63312