| 000 | 00951cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62143 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u105728 | ||
| 100 | _aBordass, B. | ||
| 245 | _aEnvelope airtightness | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects' Journal _v211(14) 13 April 2000, 48-51; 211(15) 20 April 2000, 38-39(5) |
||
| 520 | _aBritish levels of airtightness in buildings is poor compared with Europe and north America. Problems of lack of airtightness can negate low-energy strategies and cause problems post-occupancy. Improvements can be achieved easily and are essential to good performance. Case study of the Elizabeth Fry building at the University of East Anglia shows the benefits of improved airtightness. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aTHERMAL INSULATION | ||
| 650 | _aAIRTIGHTNESS | ||
| 650 | _aLOW-ENERGY BUILDINGS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-ENERGY MANAGEMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c63316 _d63316 |
||