| 000 | 00824cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38360 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10088 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aChappell, D. | ||
| 245 | _aBreach of contract | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects` Journal _v186(43) 28 October 1987, 75(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in Dean v Ainley , CA 14 July 1987, see WB2331-07, in which the house purchaser claimed damages against the vendor for breach of a specific term in the contract of sale to remedy damp in a cellar . Examines the decision in relation to architects who may have to deal with breaches of contract. | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aVENDOR AND PURCHASER | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6340 _d6340 |
||