| 000 | 00964cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3621-17 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u106190 | ||
| 245 | _aUnacceptable terms | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v0021(27) 27 May 2000, 134(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the dispute in "Westside Nominees Ltd v Bolton MBC". The two main issues raised in the rent review dispute were the way in which the premises must be taken to be subdivided for the purposes of review, and the second issue was the assumption that was to be made as to the length of the leases. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aWESTSIDE NOMINEES LTD V BOLTON METROPOLITAN BC | ||
| 650 | _aLENGTH OF TERM | ||
| 650 | _aASSUMPTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aRENTAL VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aBROWN V GLOUCESTER CC | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aNOTIONAL TERM | ||
| 650 | _aFAIR RACK RENT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c63615 _d63615 |
||