| 000 | 01059cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62317 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u106293 | ||
| 100 | _aHelps, D. | ||
| 245 | _aDanger - slippery law | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8136) 12 May 2000, 62-63(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses Judge Toulmin's decision in "Bloor Construction v Bowmer & Kirkland", how this illustrates the implied 'slip' rule in adjudication, and the gaps it reveals in the current Construction Act. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aBLOOR CONSTRUCTION V BOWMER AND KIRKLAND | ||
| 650 | _aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD | ||
| 650 | _aFW COOK V SHIMIZU | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aSLIP RULE | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c63657 _d63657 |
||