| 000 | 00790cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38370 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10130 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | _aGetting stuck with liquidated damages | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v340(5640) 19 November 1987, 7(1) |
||
| 520 | _aBriefly considers the recent case Temloc Ltd v Errill Properties Ltd in which the CA was asked to decide the effect of inserting a nil rate at which liquidated damages would be calculated under JCT 1980 clause 24 2 1 . | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6367 _d6367 |
||