| 000 | 00905cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38372 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10136 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | _aSuccess dwindles for time at large | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v339(5636) 22 October 1987, 7(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the use of the argument of " time at large " during a building contract , claiming that such an argument would be unlikely to succeed under JCT 1980 due to the inclusion of new grounds for extension of time . Highlights the decision in Peak Construction (Liverpool) Ltd v McKinney Foundations Ltd , CA 1 July 1970, 1 BLR 111. | ||
| 650 | _aICE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT CL44 | ||
| 650 | _aLIQUIDATED DAMAGES | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6371 _d6371 |
||