| 000 | 01071cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62521 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u106649 | ||
| 245 | _aRiordan Communications Ltd v South Bucks DC | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2000] JPL June 2000, 594-604(11) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 2 December 1999. The claimants R were granted planning permission for a development subject to a time limit of five years. The plans were commenced within the deadline, but then came to a halt and did not resume until four years later. The work stopped again and SB claimed that the orginal planning permission had lapsed because R lacked the genuine intention of carrying out the development. Held, claim allowed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRIORDAN COMMUNICATIONS LTD V SOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DC | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 650 | _aINTENTION | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c63857 _d63857 |
||