| 000 | 01488cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62605 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107280 | ||
| 245 | _aHarbour and General Works Ltd v Environment Agency | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aArbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal _v(2) June 2000, 125-137(13) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 19 February 1999. Parties concluded an agreement for engineering works under the ICE Conditions of Contract (6th Edition). Disputes arose regarding five claims and the engineer left some matters of quantification undecided. H was dissatisfied with these decisions and gave notice that it required the dispute to be considered under the ICE conciliation procedure. The notice of conciliation was sent two months out of time. H then applied to the court under the Arbitration Act 1996 s12 to extend time for the commencement of arbitral proceedings. "Held" the application for an extension of time to commence proceedings would be dismissed. Section 12 of the Act marked a clear change in the law and practice relating to the extending of time for arbitration. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aHARBOUR AND GENERAL WORKS LTD V ENVIRONMENT AGENCY | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S12 | ||
| 650 | _aICE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64141 _d64141 |
||