| 000 | 01125cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62633 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107382 | ||
| 245 | _aWallis Fashion Group Ltd v CGU Life Assurance Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2000] 27 EG 145-150(6) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 27 March 2000. Claimant tenant W applied for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 part II. W argued that under the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, the landlord should not require an authorised guarantee agreement. W contending reasonableness qualification. The landlord did not accept the qualifying words 'where reasonable'. 'Held' the tenant's application was allowed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) ACT 1995 | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S35 | ||
| 650 | _aWALLIS FASHION GROUP LTD V CGU LIFE ASSURANCE LTD | ||
| 650 | _aREASONABLENESS | ||
| 650 | _aTERMS | ||
| 650 | _aAUTHORISED GUARANTEE AGREEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64206 _d64206 |
||