| 000 | 01016cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62555 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107390 | ||
| 100 | _aPalmer, N. | ||
| 245 | _aFixtures and historic buildings | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aArt Antiquity and Law _v5(1) March 2000, 37-46(6) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines a recent decision concerning paintings, which used to be situated at Noseley Hall, Leicestershire. The appeal case provides an illustration of the rule that whether an object contained, or attached in a listed historic building is subject to the same planning regulations as the building, depends on whether the object is classified as a fixture in common law. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aFIXTURES | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING REGULATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMON LAW | ||
| 650 | _aNOSELEY HALL | ||
| 650 | _aCHATTELLS | ||
| 650 | _aPAINTINGS | ||
| 690 |
_aArts and antiques _96217 |
||
| 700 | _aHudson, A. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64207 _d64207 |
||