000			01416cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS54420
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u10221
041			_aeng
245			_aFirst National Bank v Thompson
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1996) 1 All ER 140-151(12)
520			_aCA 12 July 1995. On 10 July 1991, T executed a legal charge on a property to plaintiff bank F to secure their indebtedness for which he was not the registered proprietor or entitled to be so at date of charge. On 12 September 1991, the legal estate transferred to T who was duly registered as proprietor on 9 December 1991. In 1992 F applied to register charge with Land Registry. T objected on grounds that the charge was ineffective under Land Registration Act 1925 s25 and s37 as he was neither proprietor nor entitled to be one on 10 July 1991. On appeal, F contended that T had created a legal charge by estoppel. Therefore the doctrine of feeding the estoppel was correct in these circumstances and was not precluded by the terms of the 1925 Act.
650			_aBANK
650			_aCHARGE OVER REGISTERED LAND
650			_aDOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL
650			_aESTOPPEL
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
650			_aMORTGAGES
650			_aTITLE
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6425 _d6425