| 000 | 01319cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62602 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107603 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aCan you sue the referee? | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v(27) 7 July 2000, 71(1) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at jurisdiction in adjudication proceedings in the light of the dispute between Mowlem and Hydra-Tight. Mowlem in its subcontract insists it has the right to choose a barrister. Hydra-Tight disagreed and called in the ICE to appoint. Mowlem argued that if the referee continued to adjudicate, thenhe had no right to adjudicate, and that the company would sue him for costs. As an alternative, the author suggests that Mowlem could have approached the Technology and Construction Bar Association. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aTECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION BAR ASSOCIATION | ||
| 650 | _aMOWLEM | ||
| 650 | _aHYDRA TIGHT | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64294 _d64294 |
||