| 000 | 01007cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62604 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107610 | ||
| 100 | _aBessey, J. | ||
| 245 | _aBack to Latham | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v(27) 7 July 2000, 73(1) |
||
| 520 | _aArgues that adjudication is failing one of its key criteria of improving site relations. Suggests that this is because the present adjudication process does not follow all the recommendations, for resolving potential conflicts, of the Latham report. For example pre-pricing variations agreed by both parties as to cost and programme implications. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aPRE-PRICING VARIATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aLATHAM REFORMS | ||
| 650 | _aMEDIATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONCILIATION | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64297 _d64297 |
||