| 000 | 01569cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62667 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107613 | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe Mortgage Corporation v Lambert and Co (a firm) (2) Thomas Alan Stanbury | |
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2000] 6 265-271(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 11 April 2000. The claimant, (TMC) had advanced a mortgage on a house valued at £250,000 on 30 April 1990, by the defendant L. The borrowers defaulted on the mortgage and the property was repossessed. In April 1996, M's valuer retrospectively value the house, at £150,000, and the property was finally sold for £100,000. On 15 October 1996, TMC commenced proceedings, alleging that the valuers had acted negligently and over-valued the property. The issue was whether loss accrued more than six years before writ, and if the defendants assertion was correct, whether TMC could take advantage of the three year extension afforded by the Limitation Act 1980 s14A. Judge held that the provisions of the Act meant that the claimant's writ had been issued within time, the defendant appealded. 'Held' appeal dismissed. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE LENDERS | ||
| 650 | _aARREARS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE CORPORATION V LAMBERT AND CO (A FIRM) (2) THOMAS ALAN STANBURY | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S14A | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSION OF TIME | ||
| 650 | _aOVER VALUATION | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND LOCAL TAXATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64298 _d64298 |
||