000			01461cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS62565
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u107625
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aCareful what you ask for
260			_c2000
490			_aBuilding _v265(8146) 21 July 2000, 59(1)
520			_aDiscusses a dispute concerning a new bridge crossing the Manchester Ship Canal to the new Lowry Centre in Salford. The Lowry said the bridge was 34 weeks late, and so witheld money for liquidated and ascertained damages. Also tried to escape the remit of the Construction Act 1996 by backdating the contract, but the adjudicator decided to investigate jurisdiction and continued to referee. Lowry did not like the referee's decision, but the court would not stop enforcement. Article emphasises that one party cannot deny another of its legal right to adjudication, and that the Construction Act 1996 only gives jurisdiction to decide matters under the contract.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aLOWRY CENTRE
650			_aSALFORD
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aENFORCEMENT
650			_aBRIDGES
650			_aDAMAGES
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
999			_c64305 _d64305