000			01173cam a2200205 4500
001			X107844
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u107844
245			_aHair v Gillman and Inskip
260			_c2000
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[2000] 80 P&CR 108-116(9)
520			_aCA 17 February 2000. Claimants, H, owned a building which had a forecourt at the front. G had purchased a school building based at the rear of H's building from H's predecessor and parked her car on the forecourt. None of the leases in the past had included the forecourt or any express rights over it. H sought to declare that G had no right to park on the forecourt. G claimed that H's predecessor had agreed that she would be entitled to use the forecourt when she purchased the building. Judge concluded that this informal agreement was capable of being an easement. However, he found in favour of H. G appealed. Appeal allowed.
650			_aEASEMENT
650			_aIMPLIED GRANT
650			_aHAIR V GILLMAN AND INSKIP
650			_aPARKING
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S62
690			_aBoundary disputes _96221
942			_n0
999			_c64419 _d64419