| 000 | 01288cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62725 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u107925 | ||
| 100 | _aAtkinson, D. | ||
| 245 | _aAdjudication: all change | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6678) 10 August 2000, 26(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in "John Mowlem v Hydra-Tight", which will have implications on adjudications under all the ICE forms of contract. The key points raised were that Option Y of the NEC Engineering Contract doesn't comply with the Construction Act and that the ICE 7th Edition will also be affected and that a 'person' under Paragraph 2.1(a) of the Scheme may be identified in a list issued after the dispute arises. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-STANDARD FORMS OF BUILDING CONTRACT-INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aNEW ENGINEERING CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aJOHN MOWLEM V HYDRA-TIGHT | ||
| 690 |
_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64465 _d64465 |
||