| 000 | 00896cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62727 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u108005 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aInsolvent abuse | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8150) 18 August 2000, 49(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in "Bouygues v Dahl-Jensen" which upheld the adjudicator's 'wrong' decision. Questions why the court did not use liquidation law to protect Bouygues. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aLIQUIDATION | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64522 _d64522 |
||