000			01432cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS62793
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u108035
245			_aR v Braintree DC, ex parte Halls
260			_c2000
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[2000] 80 P&CR 266-279(7)
520			_aCA 1 March 2000. H and his father excercised right to buy the house of which they were tenants from the council, B. District valuer's valuation of the property did not include any allowance for development potential. Conveyance contained a covenant that the property was to be used as a single dwelling-house only. H then obtained plannning permission to erect a further dwelling house within the property''s curtilage and he intended to sell part of the garden to a developer. He requested B's consent to the sale for the purposes of the restrictive covenant. B agreed to release H from the covenant if he paid 90% of the open market value of the plot. H applied for judicial review and court below held that it was not unlawful for B to seek payment for release from covenant. H appealed. Appeal dismissed.
590			_aABS
650			_aR V BRAINTREE DC EX P HALLS
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985
650			_aRIGHT TO BUY
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANT
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aOPEN MARKET VALUE
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c64547 _d64547