| 000 | 00898cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62818 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u108353 | ||
| 100 | _aDonohoe, S. | ||
| 245 | _aRecovery by formulae of head office overheads: a case for re-engineering | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aArbitration _v66(3) August 2000, 199-201(4) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the background to the use of formulae in head office overhead claims cases and considers whether a fundamental change of approach is needed in this controversial area of law. Covers the Hudson, Emden and the Eichleay formulae. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aHEAD OFFICE OVERHEADS | ||
| 650 | _aHUDSON FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aEMDEN FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aEICHLEAY FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c64686 _d64686 |
||