000			01705cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS63002
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u108825
100			_aBrewer, G.
245		4	_aThe ICE takes on the matter of dissatisfaction
260			_c2000
490			_aContract Journal _v405(6297) 4 October 2000, 25(1)
520			_aLooks at the arrangements adopted by the ICE to preserve the professional functions of the engineer in the event of a dispute, in response to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. Before the Act, the approach of the ICE's standard form agreements was that disputes should be referred in the first instance to the engineer named in the contract. With the advent of the Act, the ICE contrived an arrangement whereby disputes would not become disputes for the purposes of the Act until they had been referred to the engineer for a decision, or the appropriate time for a decision had elapsed. Before that point, differences were to be called "matters of dissatisfaction". Discusses the view held by many observers that the ICE's "matter of dissatisfaction" approach jarrs with the requirements of the Act, and suggests the ICE may have to look again at the arrangements it has adopted.
590			_aABS
650			_aICE
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aMATTER OF DISSATISFACTION
650			_aJOHN MOWLEM & COMPANY V HYDRA-TIGHT LTD
650			_aENGINEERS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c64972 _d64972