| 000 | 01341cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63003 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u108885 | ||
| 100 | _aHelps, D. | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA natural reaction | |
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8156) 6 October 2000, 88(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the debate over the issue of the extent to which an adjudicator must act judicially and comply with the rules of natural justice. Looks at the decision in "Discain Project Services Limited v Opecprime Development Ltd", which will be welcomed by critics of this new form of dispute resolution. Judge Bowscher identified two types of breach of natural justice: procedural errors, which have no demonstrable effect on the outcome of the adjudication; and more significant breaches of the rules of natural justice that can obviously influence the decision. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDISCAIN PROJECT SERVICES LTD V OPECPRIME DEVELOPMENT LTD | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aNATURAL JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aMACOB CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION LTD | ||
| 650 | _aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65003 _d65003 |
||