| 000 | 01670cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62948 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u108938 | ||
| 100 | _aButton, R. | ||
| 245 | _aRetrospective delay analyses: a recent case history | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aCSM (Chartered Surveyor Monthly) _vOctober 2000, 34(1) |
||
| 520 | _aRecommends that surveyors, architects and engineers with responsibility for analysing the causes of delay, for the purposes of granting extensions of time or paying additional costs for prolongation or disruption, take note of a number of important recent judgements. Contains a brief summary of these cases. In "Ascon Contracting Limited v Alfred McAlpine Construction Isle of Man Limited", the court held that the float was neutral as between the various defaulting parties. In the case of "Henry Boot Construction (UK) Limited v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd" the court found that the architect is entitled to consider the contractor responsible for concurrent delays when establishing whether or not a relevant event had in fact caused delay. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDELAY ANALYSIS | ||
| 650 | _aDISRUPTION | ||
| 650 | _aADDITIONAL COSTS | ||
| 650 | _aASCON CONTRACTING LTD V ALFRED MCALPINE CONSTRUCTION (ISLE OF MAN) | ||
| 650 | _aHENRY BOOT CONSTRUCTION (UK) V MALMAISON HOTEL (MANCHESTER) | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 700 | _aMills, R. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65046 _d65046 |
||